|
||||
|
Table:
Utility maximization or motivation Introduction: Motivation has to do with inducing certain human behavior by some means. From microeconomics we have the strong concept of utility maximization. In its broadest sense utility is a complete description of what governs human behavior. The concept of motivation or incentives can therefore usefully be studied by looking at means that affect utility and thereby human behavior. Motivation is an important issue in transaction cost economics that stresses the more opportunistic kinds of motivation. This production is inspired by readings of Bernard [1938]. Mayo [1945], McGregor [1960], Simon [1958] and Taylor [1911]. |
||||
|
Types of motivation |
Elaboration and theoretical connection if any |
|||
|
Rewards - Utility
increasing |
||||
|
1) Pecuniary
benefit |
Classic
theory usually simplifies by assuming that utility can be measured in
pecuniary terms. That is reasonably to accept for many physical goods and
services and even for a concept like risk. But for the types of motivation
mentioned below (3-6) the measurement problems seem overwhelmingly. In modern
societies the most prevalent mean to induce behavior (e.g. work or give up
entitlement to a good) is to pay money. Often classic theory simplifies by
assuming money is the only factor that provides incentives. |
|||
|
2) Leisure |
Classic
theory approximates the utility from leisure by its opportunity cost the
pecuniary value of work. Some jobs include more leisure time e.g.
concessioned industries or firemen and army personnel. That may explain their
relative lower pecuniary wages. |
|||
|
3) Positive social
connections |
The
Human Relation branch of Organization Theory emphasis the role of social
connections in organizations. To the degree these are positively perceived
they provide motivation to stay in the organization even if salaries is low.
It has of cause economic interest if the managers are able to promote a
well-perceived atmosphere to keep good employees and attract others. This
theory is young and informal. It has succeeded in stressing the importance of
social relations, but work still need to be done to show how to create social
connections in a way that make organizations more efficient |
|||
|
4) Positive objectives |
The
Human Resource branch of Organization Theory stress that the activity of the
organization may be a motivational factor. One can find many examples of
people doing a couple of hours of unpaid work a week because they get utility
from supporting what they believe to be a good case. |
|||
|
5) Positive social
norms |
The
Corporate Culture branch of Organization Theory emphasizes that management
may promote efficiency by creating a corporate culture that makes employees
identifies themselves with the organization. If you feel that the
organization is a part of your own identity then you will care for its
vitality, in other words you are motivated to do your job well. E.g. people
working for IBM may believe that they make the best computers in the world and
feel proud to be a part of that team. |
|||
|
6) Many degrees of
freedom |
In
the modern capitalistic society the degrees of freedom are nearly complete.
As long as you don’t hurt anybody you can do as you please. You can limit
these degrees by signing a contract but that will be voluntarily and probably
involve compensation. Therefore this factor of motivation may be fully
exploited. As a result it may be more relevant to consider its negative
counterpart. |
|||
|
Sanctions - Utility
decreasing In
general governments are the only one allowed to carrying out sanctions as a
means to motivate people to behave in certain ways e.g. not to violate laws.
This is contrary to private agents that mostly have rewards at their disposal
to induce behavior or the thread to stop a relation. The degrees of freedom
that we have as “law obedient citizens “ are almost complete. We have the
right to move, start business, speak, vote, and live. These are the rights
that we take for granted and most of us would probably start a war if we were
denied them without a ‘fair’ reason. Government’s with its police and army
has potentially unlimited power to combat lawbreakers. Specifically they may
restrict the mentioned freedoms of the lawbreaker. But normally only fines
and imprisonment are used. The reason is the principle of vise statesmanship:
Governments should use as little power as possible to make people reasonably
law obedient. This principle could perhaps be justified by economic terms as
well. |
||||
|
- Copyright 1997-2008, ViamInvest. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Legal notice. |
||||